; I would still use sed to do it, in particular from a shell script which may
; process a large number of files.
;
; Sed is much quicker to load than perl.
the only problem being that sed doesn't cope with NULs, I'm talking
about sed in general, not a particular version of GNU sed either, so
don't bother. I'm with you though, I tend to use sed instead where I
can.
cheers,
r.
--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://slug.org.au/lists/listinfo/slug
- [SLUG] perl substitution of metacharacter Rachel Polanskis
- Re: [SLUG] perl substitution of metacharacter John Ferlito
- Re: [SLUG] perl substitution of metacharacter James Wilkinson
- Re: [SLUG] perl substitution of metacharacter Russell Davies
- Re: [SLUG] perl substitution of metacharacter Stuart Cooper
- Re: [SLUG] perl substitution of metacharacter Erich Schulz
- Re: [SLUG] perl substitution of metacharacter Russell Davies
- Re: [SLUG] perl substitution of metacharacter Russell Davies
- Re: [SLUG] perl substitution of metacharacter John Ferlito
- Russell Davies
