On Mon, Aug 28, 2000 at 02:07:42PM +1100, Erich Schulz wrote: > I would still use sed to do it, in particular from a shell script which may > process a large number of files. one of the things i *really* dislike about gnu sed (the others are too far gone to be worth considering) is it doesn't support \123 style escapes you have to end up doing evilness like: sed "s/`echo -ne '\000'`//g" which just gets annoying after a while.. -- - Gus -- SLUG - Sydney Linux User Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/ More Info: http://slug.org.au/lists/listinfo/slug
- [SLUG] perl substitution of metacharacter Rachel Polanskis
- Re: [SLUG] perl substitution of metacharacter John Ferlito
- Re: [SLUG] perl substitution of metacharacter James Wilkinson
- Re: [SLUG] perl substitution of metacharacter Russell Davies
- Re: [SLUG] perl substitution of metacharacter Stuart Cooper
- Re: [SLUG] perl substitution of metacharacter Erich Schulz
- Re: [SLUG] perl substitution of metacharacter Russell Davies
- Re: [SLUG] perl substitution of metacharacter Russell Davies
- Re: [SLUG] perl substitution of metacharacter John Ferlito
- Re: [SLUG] perl substitution of metacharacter Russell Davies
