From: DaZZa [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > >On Fri, 1 Sep 2000, John Wiltshire wrote: > >> I seem to recall some statistic that most ATMs actually run OS/2. > >No. Believe it or not. Unix. NCR Unix, to be specific - especially on >those ATM's with an NCR logo on them - which is a goodly percentage. > >It's pretty cut down and customised, but it's basically a Unix kernel. Fair enough. Most of the embedded systems I've played with run a Unix, or Unix-like kernel. I think it has something to do with not reinventing the wheel. :-) Ok, so we know the NCR ones run Unix. I've been told the IBM ones run OS/2 (unverified). Anyone know any others? John Wiltshire -- SLUG - Sydney Linux User Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/ More Info: http://slug.org.au/lists/listinfo/slug
- Re: [SLUG] OT NT on train timetable screens vs indicator b... Michael Fox
- RE: [SLUG] OT NT on train timetable screens vs indicator b... bez
- RE: [SLUG] OT NT on train timetable screens vs indicator b... John Wiltshire
- RE: [SLUG] OT NT on train timetable screens vs indicator b... John Wiltshire
- Re: [SLUG] OT NT on train timetable screens vs indicator b... John Wiltshire
- Re: [SLUG] OT NT on train timetable screens vs indicator b... Ken Yap
- Re: [SLUG] OT NT on train timetable screens vs indicator b... Ken Yap
- Re: [SLUG] OT NT on train timetable screens vs indicator b... Aaron Binns
- RE: [SLUG] OT NT on train timetable screens vs indicator b... Patrick Kelso
- Re: [SLUG] OT NT on train timetable screens vs indicator b... Dave Fitch
- Re: [SLUG] OT NT on train timetable screens vs indicator b... Aaron Binns
