On Wed, Sep 27, 2000 at 01:44:50PM +1100, Jeff Waugh wrote:
> It's starting to become a hassle. Peter at Helix Code doesn't really have
> the peer review or responsibility that the official Debian maintainers do.
> So, things get through which otherwise wouldn't. Not good.
>
> This time it's a dead Sawfish package.
why doesn't helix (or someone else) just upload the .debs to potato,
so they're in the standard dist?
(or does this happen already, and i just haven't noticed?)
i understand backporting for stable, but duplicating that much work
(poorly) for unstable is a little silly..
(of course, this would conflict a little with helix's proposed revenue
model (as i understand it).. (sigh) another project placing investors
above users)
--
- Gus
--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://slug.org.au/lists/listinfo/slug
