> Angus Lees wrote:
>
> why doesn't helix (or someone else) just upload the .debs to potato,
> so they're in the standard dist?
> (or does this happen already, and i just haven't noticed?)
No, it doesn't, and I don't get it either.
> i understand backporting for stable, but duplicating that much work
> (poorly) for unstable is a little silly..
It's starting to get up a lot of noses... and not just on the Debian
mailing lists.
> (of course, this would conflict a little with helix's proposed revenue
> model (as i understand it).. (sigh) another project placing investors
> above users)
Both Helix Code and Eazel are being fairly quiet about the details of their
business models - and it seems like they keep stepping on each other's feet.
It doesn't sound as if they've discussed each other's plans and decided to
work together (at least any more than the Naughtylus/Evolution split).
- Jeff
-- [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------------------- http://linux.conf.au/ --
Ye shall be cursed to fall in love so easily, and yet be so
cold of heart as never to express it.
--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://slug.org.au/lists/listinfo/slug
