On Sun, 3 Dec 2000, Dave Kempe wrote:
> > That is true but unlike most other distrabutions (such as RH) Debian
has
> > fewer bugs in the stable relieses. I have been running a straight from
CD
> > Potato box ever since it became frozen with verry few problems at all.
> > Compared to a RH6.2 box i had which i decided to just stick
> > debian on it due
> > to numerious problems.
>
> I've got numerous Redhat 6.2 boxes out there at many different clients,
> haven't noticed any major problems OSwise on any of them, barring the
> standard security concerns - disable wuftp!!
> As a distribution, Redhat 6.2 remains my preferred choice, until one of
the
> Debianites convinces me otherwise :)
Why do you need to be convinced? If it works it works. Who gives a rats
if its redhat, debian, suse, coyote, e-smith, slakware etc.. its still
linux, if it does the job, great, if not, why not, and then you should
have your reasons for looking at alternatives.
--
Damien
--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://slug.org.au/lists/listinfo/slug
