On Mon, Jan 29, 2001 at 09:04:50PM +1100, Dean Hamstead wrote:
> I beleive Mozilla also conforms to w3c standards and http 1.1 unlike IE
> in some (maybe all) cases. 

I don't know enough javascript to get myself out of whatever
trouble it can get you into, but the Web guy at work curses
Netscape-6 around the block, for introducing a document object
model that is apparently different to both ie and ns-4.  As I
said, I don't really know what he's trying to do, but I've seen
him poring over reams of javascript code, so I have to assume
that he has more of a clue about this than I do.  I don't know
how that issue interacts with putative W3C standards at all.

> www.mozilla.org
> 
> try 0.7, it will rock your world ;)

I also have 0.7 and galeon built and running.  I haven't got
the security thing into either of them, so they can't do https:
pages for me yet, so I still have to keep NS-4.76 around.
Doesn't do java yet either, but I'm not so concerned about that.
I haven't seen any serious uses for it in web pages.  Mostly
annoying animated buttons or the like.

It also has a bug in its IMAP client that makes it ask for
message -1 under some conditions.  That condition persists until
you quit the program and restart it.  Apart from that it _is_ a
nice mail client.  Still slow as a wet week, though.

-- 
Andrew


-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://slug.org.au/lists/listinfo/slug

Reply via email to