|We've discussed SIGs a few times now, and each time came to the conclusion |that 'splitting' SLUG would lead to bad things. By SLUG you mean the mailing list? |Dude! Rock out! :) Thanks heaps for offering - perhaps we should have a |little Debian fest (read: Come over and we'll show you wtf the point is) to |kick it off. | |Everyone else: Is this a dangerous idea? Are new lists and new SIGs |worthwhile? I don't think it's a dangerous idea at all to have a SIG. People will gravitate to fora that interest them so why get in their way? I'm not so keen on new lists, but again I wouldn't argue for stopping people doing that. -- SLUG - Sydney Linux User Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/ More Info: http://slug.org.au/lists/listinfo/slug
- Re: Interest in a Debian SIG [Was: [SLUG] MetaSLUG [... Ken Yap
- Re: Interest in a Debian SIG [Was: [SLUG] MetaSLUG [... Dan Treacy
- Re: Interest in a Debian SIG [Was: [SLUG] MetaSLUG [... Craige McWhirter
- Re: [ANN] Interest in a Debian SIG [Was: [SLUG] Meta... Craige McWhirter
- [SLUG] Re: [CTTE] Re: MetaSLUG [Was: SLUG Activities... Angus Lees
- Re: [SLUG] MetaSLUG [Was: SLUG Activities] Terry Collins
- [SLUG] Re: MetaSLUG [Was: SLUG Activities] Angus Lees
- Re: [SLUG] MetaSLUG [Was: SLUG Activities] Jon Biddell
- Re: [SLUG] MetaSLUG [Was: SLUG Activities] Terry Collins
- Re: [SLUG] MetaSLUG [Was: SLUG Activities] Jon Biddell
- Re: [SLUG] MetaSLUG [Was: SLUG Activities] Ken Yap
- Re: [SLUG] MetaSLUG [Was: SLUG Activities] Jeff Waugh
- Re: [SLUG] MetaSLUG [Was: SLUG Activities] Marty
- Re: [SLUG] MetaSLUG [Was: SLUG Activities] Terry Collins
- Re: [SLUG] MetaSLUG [Was: SLUG Activities] Jeff Waugh
- Re: [SLUG] MetaSLUG [Was: SLUG Activities] Terry Collins
- Re: [SLUG] MetaSLUG [Was: SLUG Activities] Heracles
- Re: [SLUG] MetaSLUG [Was: SLUG Activities] James Wilkinson
- Re: [SLUG] MetaSLUG [Was: SLUG Activities] Matthew Dalton
- Re: [SLUG] MetaSLUG [Was: SLUG Activities] John Clarke
- Re: [SLUG] MetaSLUG [Was: SLUG Activities] David