Andrew Reilly wrote: > > We should have a standard, published communications standard for these > > things - and all should be able to speak it. > > Absolutely. If there isn't an RFC that describes it, we > shouldn't have to deal with it :-) Is there an RFC on interoperability? If not, let's write it. It is interesting that "requests for comment" have become de facto standards and certainly are rallying marshalling points for heated technological implementation arguments. But, oddly, the RFC's themselves disclaim being any form of a standard. -rickw -- Rick Welykochy || Praxis Services Pty Limited -- SLUG - Sydney Linux User Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/ More Info: http://slug.org.au/lists/listinfo/slug
- Re: [SLUG] Open Government- No li... Paul Cameron
- Re: [SLUG] Open Government- No li... Jeff Waugh
- [SLUG] Re: Open Government- No li... Angus Lees
- Re: [SLUG] Open Government- No li... Martin
- Re: [SLUG] Open Government- No linux inter... Matthew Dalton
- Re: [SLUG] Open Government- No linux ... Jeff Waugh
- Re: [SLUG] Open Government- No li... Matthew Dalton
- Re: [SLUG] Open Government- No li... Jeff Waugh
- Re: [SLUG] Open Government- No linux inter... Crossfire
- Re: [SLUG] Open Government- No linux ... Andrew Reilly
- Re: [SLUG] Open Government- No li... Rick Welykochy
- Re: [SLUG] Open Government- No linux ... Rick Welykochy
- Re: [UNIX ECI] Re: [SLUG] Open Government- No linu... Dan Shearer
- Re: [SLUG] Open Government- No linux interface for... Michael Still
- Re: [SLUG] Open Government- No linux interface for BAS... Michael Still
- Re: [SLUG] Open Government- No linux interface for BAS lodg... Michael Lake
- RE: [SLUG] Open Government- No linux interface for BAS lodg... Marty Richards
- RE: [SLUG] Open Government- No linux interface for BAS lodg... Jill Rowling
