Daron Barndon was once rumoured to have said:
> Correct - but the kernel still doesnt support RARP (AFAIK). This is the
> problem. I believe RARP support was removed sometime during the 2.3.x
> kernels.
Why should the kernel need to support it when the daemon does that for you?
*sigh*
The kernel support was just an in-kernel implementation of the RARP
server. When using the 2.2 kernel support you'd use `rarp' to
initialise the address table.
You don't use `rarp' with 2.4, you use `rarpd' instead which
implements the RARP server in userspace.
C.
--
--==============================================--
Crossfire | This email was brought to you
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | on 100% Recycled Electrons
--==============================================--
--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug
