<stepping into the bear pit here.. > Whats the go with kernel's these days? I usually just wait for a recent one to appear one one of the magazine cd's and then just use that. But these days I hear things like the -ac tree is more stable, VM is crap in later (or is it earlier?) 2.4.x kernels, and other wierd things.
Considering that I run pretty typical desktop hardware (USB, IDE, SB Vibra 128, and TNT2 video, VIA chipsets), should I be investigating the -ac tree, or even avoiding certain versions of Linus's tree, or are there others even? Whats the goss people? Right now I'm running 2.4.3 and I have 2.4.7 and 2.4.9 on cd's at home, so i'm thinking I'll go to 2.4.9 and try avoid the 30M download. Steve -- Black holes were created when God divided by 0. -- SLUG - Sydney Linux User Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/ More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug
