On Mon, 03 Dec 2001, Rebecca Richards wrote:

> Guys,
> 
> <html>
> <head>
> <body>
> <soapbox asbestos_suit="on">
> I'm getting rather sick of idiots posting to a _Linux_ mailing list using 
> broken mailers like Outlook.  I'm getting even sicker of those who send 
> emails out with  both a plain text, and HTML version.  If the plain-text 
> message wasn't bad enough, the HTML version sure was.  It also increased the 
> number of lines I've had to scroll through * 3 + some for headers and HTML 
> fluffiness + some for the MIME-encoding lines + some for html-encoding the 
> mime-encoding lines...

Whilst I generally agree. I would definately preffered the MIME encoded
version, which follows specs properly and any reasonable email client should
read . I mean any spec compliant mailer should just show you the
version most appropriate. 

(Of course, the bandwidth and others are of a concern and rather pointless
and all. But hell at least it is following the spec and is readable.)

Benno

-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug

Reply via email to