On Tue, 26 Feb 2002, getadog wrote:

> On Tue, Feb 26, 2002 at 10:38:32AM +1100, Matthew Palmer wrote:
> > We've got a DX2/66 running our firewall here, and it's got a firewall
> > script with about 40 rules - lots of port forwarding, a transparent squid
> > proxy, and NAT.  Load average never gets a digit other than 0 in it -
> > unless I'm ssh'd in to do something - then it gets to about 0.4.  (I type
> > fast).
> 
> Your comment about load averages on a firewall shows a lack of understanding.

Sorry?  I understand load averages quite well, thankyou.  It's the average
number processes waiting for a timeslice, taken over the time which the load
average is calculated.  Although that doesn't take into account the time the
kernel spends processing packets, the other things quietly ticking along in
the background would push the load average up if the machine spent all it's
time sorting packets.

Would you care to explain exactly where my understanding of load averages is
flawed?

> But considering you do this stuff while asleep, you're forgiven.

It's the travel to SLUG meetings that wears me out.


-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
#include <disclaimer.h>
Matthew Palmer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug

Reply via email to