> On Wed, May 01, 2002 at 12:52:53PM +0930, David Fitch wrote: > > On Wed, May 01, 2002 at 11:55:00AM +1000, Matthew Hannigan wrote: > > > If applying a new kernel rpm doesn't look after > > > lilo for you as well, I'd call that a bug. > > > > guess it's a bug then. > > I don't agree. If installing a kernel package overwrites my lilo config > I'd call *that* a bug. I never use the stock kernel; I always rebuild > with my own config and then install, so the last thing I'd want is for > the upgrade to force something other than my custom kernel to boot. >
Appending to the lilo config would be allright - and save time. But I agree with your view, forcing an overwrite is a very "stupid" Windows thing to do. Regards, Alan Vink -- SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group - http://slug.org.au/ More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug
