<quote who="Anand Kumria">
> > Generally not, however some maintainers do ship cvs versions, or
> > releases with patches from cvs. sid (unstable), is meant to be unstable
> > packaging, not unstable software.
>
> Really? I thought it was just "stuff which isn't fit for release ...
> yet".
>
> Don't tell me Debian gone and changed it's definitions without a major GR
> or something ...
Regardless of the definition (I wasn't referring to it), most Debian
developers will shy away from shipping utterly broken software in sid. Thus,
in most cases, the distribution is unstable, not the software.
- Jeff
--
Perl - The Movie
Starring 'Weird' Al Yankovic
--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug
