On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 04:26:48PM +1000, Scott Ragen wrote: > Is Redhat 9 even stable? I have found all (Well since I had been using it, > from 6.0 - 8.0) major releases to be unstable, unreliable and buggy.
That's not my experience. I've had a RH9.0 server running for the last few months without any problems at all, and a RH7.0 server that's only been shutdown for kernel upgrades or hardware mods since it was built a couple of years ago. I had a 5.0 server that ran for a few years wihtout problems too, finally being replaced with 7.3 late last year. I've also found my 5.0 and 7.0 workstations to have been very reliable. I don't have a 9.0 workstation yet but I'd expect it to be just as reliable as all the others. Cheers, John -- whois [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG key id: 0xD59C360F http://kirriwa.net/john/ -- SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group - http://slug.org.au/ More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug
