On Fri, 2003-08-29 at 16:26, Scott Ragen wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 29-08-2003 04:03:29 PM: > > > Can anyone advise whether apache 2.0 (as provided in Redhat 9) is > stable? > > > OK I just gotta ask.... > Is Redhat 9 even stable? I have found all (Well since I had been using it, > from 6.0 - 8.0) major releases to be unstable, unreliable and buggy.
I use RH8 as a desktop machine - emacs, LaTeX, OpenOffice.org, gnucash,Galeon. I've never had the slightest bit of problem with 8 or any of its predecessors. Cheers, Alan > > Cheers, > > Scott > -- > SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group - http://slug.org.au/ > More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug > -- ------------------------------------------------------ Alan L Tyree http://www2.austlii.edu.au/~alan Tel: +61 2 4782 2670 Mobile: +61 405 084 990 Fax: +61 2 4782 7092 -- SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group - http://slug.org.au/ More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug
