On Sat, 2003-09-27 at 19:16, Tony Green wrote: > I'd be stunned if that ever happened. Though I do think if there is to > be a change to the list setup, it should be decided by a vote of the > financial members.
Let's cut the BS and really put it to the vote... As a financial member I would like to propose a motion for the next meeting that we vote on the slug mailing list. a) Leaving it alone. b) Moving to a moderated list. c) Changing it to a members only list. d) Changing it to a financial members only list. Option b) will revert to an a) unless we have at least 3 volunteers for a guaranteed 12 months. Separate motion: Any whingers gainsaying this duly taken vote are automatically warned and on a repeat offence given a automatic moderation for a period of one week for each further offence. (second offence is two weeks, third offence three, etc) OK I don't think this one will fly but hopefully just raising it some will get the hint. Just in case I am unable to make the meeting I nominate Tony or Jeff as my proxy. They seem echo my opinions on this matter. -- Thanks KenF OpenOffice.org developer -- SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group - http://slug.org.au/ More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug
