On Sat, 2003-09-27 at 19:52, Robert Collins wrote: > On Sat, 2003-09-27 at 19:48, Ken Foskey wrote: > > On Sat, 2003-09-27 at 19:43, Tony Green wrote: > > > On Sat, 2003-09-27 at 19:41, Ken Foskey wrote: > > > > > > > > Let's cut the BS and really put it to the vote... > > > > > > I can't speak for the ctte any more, but I emailed them today about it. > > > Hopefully we can get an announce about the plans for the next meeting > > > soon...... > > > > This really is a formal motion... > > > > I want to vote discussion out of existence. Just in case there is any > > doubt about my intentions. > > Right. Formally: > > I intend to speak pro option a) at the meeting. I propose that we amend > the motion, such that if there is no "pro-option X" speaker for each of > the options, those options without a speaker are removed from the list. > > Will someone second this amendment?
Seems only fair. Seconded. -- Thanks KenF OpenOffice.org developer -- SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group - http://slug.org.au/ More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug
