The following are my opinions, if your opinions differ then let us know :-)
On Thu, 2003-10-30 at 13:43, Mary Gardiner wrote: > On Thu, Oct 30, 2003, Jan Schmidt wrote: > > a) Leaving it alone. No moderation, users that are not subscribed can post. We have a spam filter but it only works most of the time, no guarantee. > > b) Moving to a moderated list. I think this means we allow subscribed members through but people who have not subscribed are subject to a visual check. This is subject to at least 3 volunteers able to perform this task 7 days a week. Does anyone actually want a FULLY moderated list? I wish for it sometimes but generally we are not flaming others except with tongue firmly in cheek. > > c) Changing it to a members only list. Only those subscribed and correctly responded to the subscribe confirmation may post to the list. All other posts are discarded. Note that this includes posts by individuals from work when their normal subscription is from home. As I understand it is possible to subscribe as "post only". > > d) Changing it to a financial members only list. Only financial members may post on the list. Note that this is answers as well as questions. There are not many financial members of SLUG. -- Thanks KenF OpenOffice.org developer -- SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group - http://slug.org.au/ More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug
