On Thu, Oct 30, 2003, Mary Gardiner wrote: > On Thu, Oct 30, 2003, Jan Schmidt wrote: > > It has been pointed out that the actual motion to be voted on at > > tomorrow's meeting is: > > > > a) Leaving it alone. > > b) Moving to a moderated list. > > c) Changing it to a members only list. > > d) Changing it to a financial members only list.
Since Ken proposed the vote, let's take his list of interpretations at http://lists.slug.org.au/archives/slug/2003/10/msg00613.html as definitive. If you think there are other alternatives, then perhaps amend the motion? This is all getting a bit formal. So, the final interpretation is: a) Leaving it alone b) Moving to a moderated list. Non-subscriber posts will be moderated. Subscriber posts will be allowed through. Jan has noted that this option requires three willing moderators. c) Changing it to a members only list. Non-subscriber posts will be discarded. Subscriber posts will be allowed through. d) Changing it to a financial members only list. Only financial members may post to the list. -Mary -- SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group - http://slug.org.au/ More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug
