Peter Hardy wrote: > Rather than just building and installing from a source tarball, would it > be possible for you to backport from unstable? The advantage of that is > that you end up with a .deb, meaning you don't break your dependency > chain. There's no guarantee, however, that the unstable package is the > most recent. But it will be fairly close. :-)
They are no later candidatates for either testing or unstable testing & unstable are at: libdbi-perl 1.35-1 (out of date) testing & unstable are at: libdbd-mysql-perl 2.9003-1 (up to date) I have a tarball for DBI-perl at 1.41 Main reason why I need to install libdbd-mysql-perl from source is to compile it on my machine here and see if I get the segfault that the binary dist gets. Mike -- Mike Lake Caver, Linux enthusiast and interested in anything technical. UTS CRICOS Provider Code: 00099F DISCLAIMER ======================================================================== This email message and any accompanying attachments may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, do not read, use, disseminate, distribute or copy this message or attachments. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete this message. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the sender expressly, and with authority, states them to be the views the University of Technology Sydney. Before opening any attachments, please check them for viruses and defects. ======================================================================== -- SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/ Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html
