On Wed, Feb 25, 2004 at 04:11:10PM +1100, Michael Lake said > Peter Hardy wrote: > > Rather than just building and installing from a source tarball, would it > > be possible for you to backport from unstable? The advantage of that is > > that you end up with a .deb, meaning you don't break your dependency > > chain. There's no guarantee, however, that the unstable package is the > > most recent. But it will be fairly close. :-) > > They are no later candidatates for either testing or unstable > > testing & unstable are at: libdbi-perl 1.35-1 (out of date) > testing & unstable are at: libdbd-mysql-perl 2.9003-1 (up to date) > > I have a tarball for DBI-perl at 1.41 > > Main reason why I need to install libdbd-mysql-perl from source is to > compile it on my machine here and see if I get the segfault that the > binary dist gets.
Try dh-make-perl, it'll make snazyy little packages out of tarballs from CPAN. -- Rob Weir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Do I look like I want a CC? Words of the day: AGT. AMME terrorist import encryption assassinate
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-- SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/ Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html
