> > > >>Were windows has a forced > > >>evolutionary development based on what sells > software. > Much as I hate to admit it, it's worked pretty well > in respect of that > goal. It could be argued that its evolution has been > quite successful to > date. Whether it can handle what looks like a coming > ice-age is probably > a subject for slug-chat. > This is probably the reason why linux has not been as widespread yet as expected. Each of us seem to have a tiny thought at the back of our minds which is nagging us saying: Could it be that the MS style is finally correct? And we tend to apologize and somehow admit to justification that there *has* to be something right about MS to have grown so much. Fact is that soon, taking a similar analogy, we might be saying: There must be something right in what the terrorists are demanding otherwise they would not be so widespread! Does a thousand (millions here) lies make a truth?? Most of us seem to think so. Just because you had no choice on what was thrown at your face when you first faced a computer does not mean it was right.
-- Kanwar Find local movie times and trailers on Yahoo! Movies. http://au.movies.yahoo.com -- SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/ Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html
