I would like to know what from my original message was so terrible that it is considered good form to make personal attacks on me from. Im happy to be wrong in my opinion but maybe people could point this out to me in a reasonable way rather that being offensive.

Certainly some people on this list seem to have an opinion that they have special rights, and can treat people how they wish.

I don't think this thread needs to continue, if its going to be about this.

Ill try to get along to the next slug meeting where jeff and erik can explain in person. Though with the current state of my health I cant guarantee to be there.

bd


On 21/01/2005, at 11:03 AM, Peter Hardy wrote:

I call shenanigans on this thread.

Cut it out, or I'll get my broom.

On Fri, 2005-01-21 at 11:02 +1100, Ben de Luca wrote:
yes, being rude and arrogant expected if your an open source developer,
at least on slug.



On 21/01/2005, at 10:50 AM, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:

On Fri, 21 Jan 2005 10:24:07 +1100
O Plameras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Hi Sluggers,

Does this list-service tolerate 'public ridicule' to a
reasonable comment ?

I Jeff's response to Ben pretty reasonable considering what he was replying to.

I suggest that you take your personal vendettas [0] elsewhere.

Erik

[0] http://lists.slug.org.au/archives/slug/2004/11/msg00080.html
--
+-----------------------------------------------------------+
  Erik de Castro Lopo  [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Yes it's valid)
+-----------------------------------------------------------+
"life is too long to know C++ well" -- Erik Naggum
--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html



-- SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/ Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


-- SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/ Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html

Reply via email to