<quote who="Gottfried Szing"> > we have tried several wikis and after some testing we have chosen the > fastest one with an mysql backend.
That horrible squealing sound you hear is the sound of brakes screeching against metal. :-) > the hardware was a typical for a server for a small company an x86 with > 2mhz, 1 gig ram. *cripes* > so maybe someone knows a wiki (preferable with db-backend and not a > file-system based on) that is faster and can handle more than only 2 > concurrent users. So your problem here is between the parentheses. Why do you want one that uses a relational database instead of a filesystem? You know that a wiki naturally maps well to a filesystem, and doesn't require *any* of the features of a relational database system? (Least of all MySQL, which is a suboptimal choice for rapid, multi-connection, read/write applications, which is precisely what a web app is.) Your machine is significantly overpowered for the purpose of running a simple wiki. Use the filesystem backend - it's the natural thing to do. :-) - Jeff -- linux.conf.au 2005: Canberra, Australia http://linux.conf.au/ "It's the most fun I've had without the use of a water-based lubricant." - Stephen Fry on directing his first film -- SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/ Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html
