Thanks Matt for your assistance anyway!! I appreciate it I shall look into it further with hylafax themselves.
Phill -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matthew Palmer Sent: Monday, 14 February 2005 2:28 PM To: [email protected] Subject: [SLUG] Re: hylafax On Mon, Feb 14, 2005 at 02:13:37PM +1100, Phill wrote: > I used the following command with produced the output shown. Maybe this > will mean more to you than me (not being an expert). But I do know that > the document just sits in the sendq directory and goes no further. There > does not appear to be any time restrictions in the config file. I can't see anything particularly weird in there, and since the fax ends up in sendq we can reasonably assume that the sendfax part of the deal works OK. Possible problems I can imagine: 1) hfaxd isn't notifying faxq of the existence of the job (although I'd presume that faxq would notice the job sitting there sooner or later); 2) faxq is looking somewhere else for it's jobs instead of wherever hfaxd is dropping them; 3) faxq thinks it doesn't know how to send faxes. Unfortunately, I'm not enough of a hylafax guru to tell you how to debug those possibilities. It's probably time to go talking to the Hylafax people directly. - Matt
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
-- SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/ Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html
