On Mon, 2005-02-14 at 14:23 +1100, Michael Fox wrote: > Appreciated. > > I might get the divico fusion one mentioned around here... and the > price might not be as cheap as the Twinhan, but hey.. if it works I > don't mind if its a little more.
Be careful with this. I've got one, and it's non-trivial to get going (well, it's non-trivial to get going if you want to keep the guarantees your package manager gives you about the authenticity of the code on your system. It's apparently straightforward otherwise). I did try to make a set of packages to make it work, but it uses a different version of the v4l2 code than what is in the mainline kernel (at least as of 2.6.9. I'm not sure about now). Unless you're more of a kernel build ninja than I am, you won't be able to do a clean build of it and you'll need to use the rather dodgy method described on Chris Pascoe's website, which involves mangling the module dependencies file. I'm running mine under Windows XP until such time as upstream uses the same version of v4l2; Seems like too much bother otherwise (to me). HTH, James. -- "There is no I in TEAM but there is an i in Ninja" -- http://www.ninjaburger.com/sekrit/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/ Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html
