On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 15:04:05 +1100, James Gregory <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Be careful with this. I've got one, and it's non-trivial to get going > (well, it's non-trivial to get going if you want to keep the guarantees > your package manager gives you about the authenticity of the code on > your system. It's apparently straightforward otherwise). I did try to > make a set of packages to make it work, but it uses a different version > of the v4l2 code than what is in the mainline kernel (at least as of > 2.6.9. I'm not sure about now). Unless you're more of a kernel build > ninja than I am, you won't be able to do a clean build of it and you'll > need to use the rather dodgy method described on Chris Pascoe's website, > which involves mangling the module dependencies file. > > I'm running mine under Windows XP until such time as upstream uses the > same version of v4l2; Seems like too much bother otherwise (to me).
Kernel compiling and hacking don't concern me. I am quite happy to tinker with compiling the kernel a few times. I'll let you know how I go. Another thing I like about the divico fusion one is the fact it is capable to be used in a slim pci slot. It even comes with a slim pci bracket. So that sold me. I will put the machine into a aopen H340B case. Anyone got the fusion plus and fusion lite cards to work together in same machine? Just out of interest. -- SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/ Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html
