<quote who="Craige McWhirter"> > http://www.smh.com.au/news/National/Copyright-laws-under-review/2005/02/14/1108229936338.html?oneclick=true > http://www.smh.com.au/news/TV--Radio/Brave-new-world-for-a-couch-potato/2005/02/14/1108229927903.html > > Two in one day. There's a PR officer in News who's working their little > heart out to make us feel better about our loss of freedoms.
This is probably better off on slug-chat, but given that you've raised it here: What exactly is objectionable in these articles? They seem entirely balanced, reasonable and well-informed to me. Quoting the big end of town when writing an article about a controversial topic is not exactly pandering to their desires. - Jeff -- linux.conf.au 2005: April 18th-23rd http://linux.conf.au/ "Women are too irrational to be crazed killers anyway." - Angus Lees -- SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/ Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html
