On Wed, May 25, 2005 at 06:35:21PM +1000, Robert Collins wrote: > On Wed, 2005-05-25 at 18:23 +1000, Peter Miller wrote: > > > > > > Except that the g++ people, in their infinite anti-wisdom, chose not > > to > > implement it for g++. There are dozens of bug reports for this, all > > closed with "not a bug". > > I guessing its a C++ spec issue, not gcc per se. > > That said, I don't see why it couldn't be a g++ extension.
It's because missing a prototype is always an error for C++. Matt -- SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/ Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html
