On Wed, 2006-01-25 at 11:53 +1100, Simon wrote: > Hi all, > AT the risk of starting a flamewar.....I am being advised by consultants > that I need to 'upgrade' my Fedora Core servers to RH Enterprise as it > is 'more robust', 'better supported', 'easier to upgrade' etc etc. We > are currently running them as our webserver (informational only - no > transactions), mailserver and intranet webserver (this one is a bit > slow, but just needs more RAM). > > I am unaware of any major differences in the products that would require > us to change over and start paying for what we now do for free - > maintenance has been trivial, yum runs regularly via cron, downtime has > been non-existent. > > Any thoughts?
Welcome to commercialised Linux ? Seriously, I wouldn't run Fedora in a production environment, not *because its bad* (its not), but because Redhat does not offer commercial support like they do for RHEL. That said, if you dont have a support contract today, then its hardly a problem is it ? - just make whatever commercial decision makes sense to you. [or find a different linux/a different consultant] Rob -- GPG key available at: <http://www.robertcollins.net/keys.txt>.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/ Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html
