More robust: I would ask what EXACTLY do they mean with that. It's a proper services configuration that will make a big difference. Then if you call it mission critical, there's grsecurity (www.grsecurity.org) and the likes. And don't rely on PCs. Go for a rackmount. Saying that distro A is more robust than B is basically assuming that you will be using something out of the box. In all other cases, it's the way you handle it that will make a difference.
also. regardless of the software, if your hardware is unreliable, then so will be your server. a dead disk is a dead disk no matter what the OS it still has the same problem Dean -- SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/ Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html
