On Wednesday 25 January 2006 09:51, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > More robust: I would ask what EXACTLY do they mean with that. It's a > proper services configuration that will make a big difference. Then if > you call it mission critical, there's grsecurity (www.grsecurity.org) > and the likes. And don't rely on PCs. Go for a rackmount. Saying that > distro A is more robust than B is basically assuming that you will be > using something out of the box. In all other cases, it's the way you > handle it that will make a difference.
Read what RedHat says: near parphrase: Bleeding edge apps, not suitable for production use .... YMMV but you have been warned James -- SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/ Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html
