Spamassasin is running and trapping -
SLUG gets about 30 spam messages a day for deletion by moderators.
SLUG CHAT gets about 20 spam messages a day for deletion by moderators.
the other lists 2-10 spam messages a day for deletion by moderators.
There are occassional genuine messages, mostly from the subscriber only
lists.
Ken
TongMaster wrote:
On Sat, 2006-02-18 at 12:59 +1100, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
Thats really nice, but it seems a little strange to have everyone
subscribed to list all devoting cpu cycles to filtering if a single
filter on the list input would serve the same function.
The filters on a centralised server will always be behind current SPAM
trends, as far as I can see because it's more difficult to train than
your local SPAM solutions. Yes, we should have a centralised SPAM filter
(and probably do) but without someone training it it's going to lag and
more SPAM will get through.
If you keep your own filters trained and working properly, you'll not
see the ones that do creep through.
My main point in short, is that if people kept their own SPAM solutions
working properly, they wouldn't notice the odd one that slips through
SLUG's SPAM processing. They would also have more appreciation for the
work involved in keeping SPAM filters up to date.
--
Peter Reith is told in Darwin by Brigadier Silverstone that the video
does not show childern in the water. He replies "Well, we'd better not
see the video!"
-- October 9th, 2002.
--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html
