On Mon, 29 May 2006 14:57:35 +1000, "Michael Kedzierski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 5/29/06, Peter Rundle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> 1. Should slug be a subscribers only list? > > I think this makes sense, I don't know why someone would be posting to > a list they aren't a part of. >
I can think of a few reasons, however the number of people who do it should be small. It's not like the requests will go to the bin, they'll be held for moderation. The admins can then use the 'auto accept mail from this address' once they've verified it's not spam. I'm not in favour of a closed list, but there are options to lessen the pain if the ctte decide to go down that path. -- Tony Green <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/ Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html
