On Wednesday 07 June 2006 10:00, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I shot this off to the coders list this morning but I think it id going > to be of general interest. > > This is a question for those with much more c/c++ experience than me. I > have discovered that dapper and possibly breezy both lack the ld.so.conf > file instead relying on ldconfig which only looks at /usr/lib and /lib > for libraries. > > Is this a good thing? This is a serious question. When I asked about > this I was told I shouldn't be using /usr/local/lib anymore. Considering > how much software still defaults to building/installing > in /usr/local/...
But if you put one in it works normally. EG I built mythtv which locates in /usr/local. I made a ld.so.conf with /usr/local/lib, rebooted <blush>, everything works James -- SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/ Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html
