On Saturday 08 July 2006 23:11, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >         Suse                                  Ubuntu
> >
> > Easy for complex server                       Hard for complex server
> >                                       eg Firewall, MASQ, tun setup &
> > routing
>
> So, I would not describe these as 'complex server' tasks. These are basic
> network things for which Debian/Ubuntu don't provide an *enormous* amount
> of built-in clicky-clicky (CLI or GUI, helper tools are still
> clicky-clicky).
>
> On the other hand, for a truly complex server infrastructure, I would not
> choose anything but Debian/Ubuntu. I have been doing some Red Hat admin
> again recently, and every task reminds me how much easier life is on Debian
> and Ubuntu. Partly, this is because Red Hat chose to marginalise RHEL by
> making it available only to enterprise-paying customers, so the community
> around RHEL is *significantly* smaller than the communities around Fedora,
> Debian and Ubuntu.
>
> For things like mail server systems, web servers and so on, I would choose
> the Debian/Ubuntu world without worry.

I've tried a few, settled on guidedog, guarddog.
I still see no way of adding these to my firewall rules:
    iptables -A INPUT -i tun+ -j ACCEPT
    iptables -A FORWARD -i tun+ -j ACCEPT

> > Sysadmin works, is easy, is nice      Sysadmin patchy, some works, some
> > does not eg system -> administration -> services see tricks later:
> > update-rc.d
>
> I'm surprised you'd say 'patchy' about a distro that is essentially made by
> sysadmins, for sysadmins. That has been a delight for me about Debian since
> I first started using it. When you say 'tricks', I think you mean "things
> that are different and/or that I'm not used to because I don't have as much
> experience on this platform". How different, really, is update-rc.d to,
> say, chkconfig? They're both obtuse command line programs.

I want a desktop image saved in .icons. What did I NOT do to find out that ^L 
will let me see hidden dirs? (<grin> I asked SLUG) This is IMHO a trick 
rather than things that are different.

An eg of patchy. Specific now: latest dapper 6.06: 
System -> Administration -> Services

I want to enable bpalogin (which I installed). It is not listed. I select 
'help'. It shows a menu, with checkboxes. That's not an option, despite the 
help display. That's patchy!

I'm quite happy with the CLI. If you need the CLI to do stuff then
System -> Administration -> Services should say "For more, use update-rc.d"

> > RPM is usually easy and lots of info  apt-get is very easy
> > is available about installed          not detailed info about packages
> > packages, changed packages,           eg apt-get install kubuntu-desktop
> > adds 800M contents of packaghes                    apt-get remove
> > kubuntu-desktop  dels 40K !!
>
> Others have answered about apt-get vs. aptitude/synaptic/etc, but... Info
> about packages is lacking in Debian/Ubuntu? Dude, this is the platform that
> *drove* modern package management demands. What info are you missing? I'm
> pretty sure this comes down to "I'm familiar with the rpm commands, but not
> familiar with the apt/dpkg commands" - same as above.

I'm sure that you are correct :-), I'm trying to be objective, so your 
comments are most usefull.
I guess that having spent years using RedHat, the transition to SuSE was quick 
(1 week to say this is better) and easy.
Its clear (and it's been since the release of Dapper) that I'm not finding 
this transition easy. Specially since I'm jumping in and trying to do fairly 
complex stuff right off (eg openvpn, with associated firewall setup)

>
> > multimedia possible                   multimedia easy - easyubuntu
> >
> > KDE Very clear and obvious    Gnome Full of undocumented (obviously)
> > tricks

Cheers
James
--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html

Reply via email to