True. I will not contest that there may be better alternatives than this alternative, it just happened to be one which I had played with for a few years - and it just happened to be a good idea at the time! Now don't get me started griping about qmail...
Regards, Mark. On 6/19/07, Michael Chesterton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
"Mark Gibson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > If you want an alternative to Bind, then there is djbdns: > http://cr.yp.to/djbdns.html > > Easier configuration and management, though there isn't as much > documentation as bind. Now that's a controversial recommendation. ;) http://www.maradns.org/advocacy.html#djbdns I think since the author has abandoned it, and doesn't permit other people to fix it, it's not a good choice. bind is handy to learn, anyway. If you ever have to work on another systems dns server, there is a good chance it's running bind. It also has the biggest support community. I would suggest if the OP is fed up with doing on his own, he asks for help with error messages, etc. -- Michael Chesterton http://chesterton.id.au/blog
-- SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/ Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html
