On Thu, Sep 20, 2007 at 12:37:04AM +1000, Ken Foskey wrote: > On Tue, 2007-09-18 at 18:34 +1000, Minh Van Le wrote: > > I've been browsing at some Unix interoperability programs and emulators like > > Cygwin, Windows Services for Unix (SFU), coLinux, Uwin, VMWare etc. > > > > My quick question is, Is Windows Services for Unix (SFU) better than Cygwin > > ? > > No, yes, I give up. > > Cygwin is Unix on the desktop, I have built production systems in it
How provides the support on the cygwin environment - how have you gone about selling the cygwin to the company ? > that worked great and could be moved onto a real operating system later. > Cygwin has overheads in disk IO and therefore may be slow in certain > circumstances though I have never experienced it, it is good enough for > me. > > We use Windows Unix components to create NFS exports to Unix and it > works great. > > -- > Ken Foskey > FOSS developer > > -- > SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/ > Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html >
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-- SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/ Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html
