On Feb 12, 2008 12:18 PM, Rev Simon Rumble <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This one time, at band camp, Adrian Chadd wrote: > > ideally you want your data security right down to the individual syscall > > level. > > Various products like what Cisco offer let you specify what access to what > > data various applications have, but i don't know how useful it is protecting > > people from copy/pasting data around. I know at least the "secure" versions > > of IRIX and Digital UNIX were doing useful things like tagging individual > > IPC > > data with security ACLs, preventing you from copy/pasting between high->low > > security contexts. That was fun to work inside. :) > > But the nice security vendor man installed a box on our network and gave > me a certificate that promised we were secure!
I have a bridge you can buy if you want, Simon. Going cheap! Great revenue possibilities! DaZZa -- SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/ Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html
