On Mon, 2008-05-05 at 11:44 +1000, DaZZa wrote: > Does the Linux world support the concept of active/passive (passive > node takes over if active fails) clustering for this kind of > situation? Or even active/active (both nodes answer requests depending > on load)?
http://www.linux-ha.org/ - Thanks, . Sonia Hamilton http://www.snowfrog.net http://training.snowfrog.net http://www.linkedin.com/in/soniahamilton . Your manuscript is both good and original; but the part that is good is not original and the part that is original is not good - Samuel Johnson. -- SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/ Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html
