given the samba-oriented nature of dazza's query,
in addition to linux-ha take a look at
http://ctdb.samba.org/
i believe this is the sort of system you are after?
Dean
Sonia Hamilton wrote:
On Mon, 2008-05-05 at 11:44 +1000, DaZZa wrote:
Does the Linux world support the concept of active/passive (passive
node takes over if active fails) clustering for this kind of
situation? Or even active/active (both nodes answer requests depending
on load)?
http://www.linux-ha.org/
-
Thanks,
.
Sonia Hamilton
http://www.snowfrog.net
http://training.snowfrog.net
http://www.linkedin.com/in/soniahamilton
.
Your manuscript is both good and original; but the part that is good is
not original and the part that is original is not good - Samuel Johnson.
--
http://fragfest.com.au
--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html
