The only downside I've found with KVM is its need for processor
virtualisation features. I use a cheap laptop without the feature, that
I need to keep a load of virtual images on, and for these VirtualBox
works great - I use these images for support and portability purposes
rather than production data crunching.
Are the benefits of KVM related to its production throughput
capabilities ?  RedHat to me looks to be pushing it as part of
"branding" - it needs flagship technologies to differentiate itself. Any
pointers to articles on the subject ?
thanks
Rod

On 01/10/11 21:03, Dean Hamstead wrote:
> Hi David
> 
> All the linux big boys are moving fast to KVM. Redhat and IBM have
> abandoned Xen completely, making it an out of kernel patch set
> maintained by Citrix and perhaps code from Oracle. Youll find that
> Debian has also elected to discontinue Xen in the next release.
> 
> Virtualbox is still nice for desktop quasi-trivial virtualisation. (Im
> sure someone objects to that, and has taken it to a huge scale...)
> 
> KVM is still the only in kernel hypervisor (if thats what it is, which
> it sort of isnt).
> 
> VMware is free as in beer.
> 
> At my telco of employ, we are using KVM extensively. Im of the opinion
> is the most sane design, gives you the most control and follows the unix
> way of re-using existing components to the nth degree.
> 
> Chances are its already installed on your reasonably recent release
> distribution of choice.
> 
> Dean
> 
> On 10/01/11 20:57, david wrote:
>> I've migrated a server to virtualbox for the purpose of experimentation
>> (namely, to resolve upgrade issues going from Ubuntu 8.04 to 10.04). I
>> used MondoArchive to clone the hardware server onto a Virtualbox virtual
>> server. All good so far.
>>
>> I'm thinking of building future servers within virtual environments -
>> ie: the server built as a solitary virtual machine within its host.
>>
>> I'm hoping that will make future upgrades, migration and back-up easier.
>> I currently run 3 public servers, none of which are heavily loaded.
>>
>> What virtualisation solutions would people suggest? and is there any
>> reason this is not a good idea?
>>
>> thanks..
>>
>> David.
>>
>>
-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html

Reply via email to