On 10/15/07, Hendra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > i tot this is a good idea, and should not be dismissed entirely just because > some "very importants questions" went unanswered ;) > may I suggest whoever in charge of slugnet to take over and decide whether > or not to create the group? > > H >
Yes, a LinkedIn group (or anything else) named 'slugnet' should be sanctioned and authorised by LUGS, with a clear link on the LUGS homepage indicating this permission in case 'busy bodies' like me want to know more. What troubles me more is that Deepan's original post was sent out last Saturday and *nobody* asked questions about it until me, today (Monday). My excuse is that I'm don't access the Internet on weekends. What's yours?...};-) Fortunately, no harm done and I don't believe Deepan is a phisher. But we may not be so lucky next time. Regards, Kam Yung -- Soh Kam Yung my Google Reader Shared links: (http://www.google.com/reader/shared/16851815156817689753) my Google Reader Shared SFAS links: (http://www.google.com/reader/shared/user/16851815156817689753/label/sfas) _______________________________________________ Slugnet mailing list [email protected] http://www.lugs.org.sg/mailman/listinfo/slugnet
