On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 11:44 AM, Martin Langsjoen <[email protected]> wrote: > [...] > There are some issues that remains to be sorted out. George Makrydakis > points out some interesting issues in this blog: "LGPL 2.1, Qt 4.5 and C > ++ templates" - > http://lab.obsethryl.eu/content/lgpl-21-qt-45-and-c-templates > > It seems like this issue is already forwarded to the license lawyers at > Nokia. The future is promising. > [...]
There's been an update to indicate that an exception for LGPL might be made in this case. ===== [...] An update, from the qtlabs blog [http://labs.trolltech.com/blogs/2009/01/14/nokia-to-license-qt-under-lgpl/]: Legal has been made aware of the issue, and are working on an exception for the LGPL 2.1, to fully enable commercial development towards the LGPL library with all its templates and inline functions, as was the intention. [...] ===== -- Soh Kam Yung my Google Reader Shared links: (http://www.google.com/reader/shared/16851815156817689753) my Google Reader Shared SFAS links: (http://www.google.com/reader/shared/user/16851815156817689753/label/sfas) _______________________________________________ Slugnet mailing list [email protected] http://wiki.lugs.org.sg/LugsMailingListFaq http://www.lugs.org.sg/mailman/listinfo/slugnet
