On Thu, 2009-10-08 at 23:33 +0800, Michael Clark wrote: > Harish Pillay wrote: > >> This is interesting... > >> > >> http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/10/07/microsoft_red_hat_virtualization_interoperability_pact/ > >> > >> > >> "Microsoft and Red Hat have now consummated vows to love and cherish each > >> other's operating systems on their corresponding hypervisors. > >> > >> The interoperability pact was inked in February of this year, leading > >> the companies to "synchronize testing" in counterpart validation > >> programs over the months. Starting today, businesses can mix and mingle > >> Windows Server and Red Hat Enterprise Linux on visualized environments > >> with joint support from Microsoft and Red Hat." > >> > > > > It is a pure support arrangement. Mutually beneficial in which a customer > > running windows guest on a RHEL host will be helped out if the customer > > calls Red Hat for help. It would be vice-versa if the OSes were swapped > > around. > > > > Of course. I think it makes a lot of sense. Its a good strategy to help > with getting linux into major windows shops. interop is always good stuff.
We run linux as a host and windows as the guest. Works well. Ain't willing to try things the other way around :P ... so now we can call MS support and officially tell them that I don't have a START BUTTON on the left bottom of my screen? :P _______________________________________________ LUGS Mailing list - [email protected] List FAQ: http://wiki.lugs.org.sg/LugsMailingListFaq Info page: http://www.lugs.org.sg/mailman/listinfo/slugnet To unsubscribe send an empty email to: [email protected]
