On 10/17/2016 11:44 AM, Lachlan Musicman wrote: > I've had consistent success with the documented system - "rpmbulid > slurm-<release>.tgz" then yum installing the resulting files, using > 15.x, 16.05 and 17.02. well, i had no problems on centos but on fedora there are some hardened policies that change linkage (as i understood from the tickets), so i had to apply some patches to build AND run (with only CFLAGS patch it build successfully but there were dlopen errors because missing symbols so i had to disable the hardened policy in order to make it run)
> Have on occasion needed to recompile - hdf5 support and for non main > line plugins, but otherwise it's been pretty easy. > > Will happily support/debug your efforts, and have used Ole's useful > notes as well. > > I'm a Centos 7.2 user atm, would happily get from epel or copr. so this is my slurm copr https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/asevcenc/science-utils/package/slurm/ it is not clear to me why it failed to build on f23 and f24 when the uploaded srpm was build successfully on f23 Thank you! Adrian > > Cheers L. > > ------ The most dangerous phrase in the language is, "We've always > done it this way." > > - Grace Hopper > > On 17 October 2016 at 19:19, Adrian Sevcenco > <adrian.sevce...@spacescience.ro > <mailto:adrian.sevce...@spacescience.ro>> wrote: > > > On 10/17/2016 10:46 AM, Andrew Elwell wrote: >> >> Hi folks, > Hi! > >> >> I see from https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1149566 >> <https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1149566> that there >> have been a few unsuccessful attempts to get slurm into fedora (and >> potentially EPEL) >> >> Is anyone on this list actively working on it at the moment? I'll >> update the bugzilla ticket to prod the last portential packager >> but failing that I'm offering to work on it. >> >> My plan is to get 16.05 into fedora, but not into EPEL itself (the >> supported life of a given release is just too short to match with >> the RHEL timeline), however I'll probably put "unofficial" srpms >> publicly available that shoud meet all the epel packaging >> requirements. >> >> schedmd people - as some of this may involve patches to the spec >> file amongst other things, what's the best way to progress this - >> attach a diff to something on your bugzilla page rather than git >> pull req? > > Just recently i succeed to build and run successfully 16.05.5 on > fedora 23 and i had to use patches from : > https://bugs.schedmd.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2443 > <https://bugs.schedmd.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2443> and > https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/slurm-devel/HiltSkNiGJU > <https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/slurm-devel/HiltSkNiGJU> > > (well i succeeded locally as in my copr repo i still have problem > with f23 and f24 but i don't know why) > > it would seem that these problems on fedora (with the hardened build) > are known but so far no work towards solving (nor workarounds > implementation) was done .. > > Thanks, Adrian > > -- ---------------------------------------------- Adrian Sevcenco, Ph.D. | Institute of Space Science - ISS, Romania | adrian.sevcenco at {cern.ch,spacescience.ro} | ----------------------------------------------
