I still do not understand if the airbridge can do that at $150 why can they
not make the app ($330) do this mac nat?  I have cisco radios that repeat so
they must have address 4? Right now I am trying to use an airbridge to
connect to the main ap(cisco) and setup the app in ap mode(making a
repeater). I can get this to work but the thruput is terrible. I will try
some more. I would really like to use sb products but I am not going to
replace all of the repeaters at once. If I cannot get this to work then
maybe I just stick with airbridge for customer and go with something else
for ap's. The main reason for me wanting to go with smartbridge was to get
away from the cisco proprietary extentions. It looks as though sb might be
another problem with this address 4?? I want to have a system that does not
need me to turn stuff on and off to get everything working again (cisco
extentions). If sommething has a temp disconnect it comes back up by itself.
Tired of babysitting the network. SB is the right pricerange. Any
suggestions?

Jerry

----- Original Message -----
From: "Lars Gaarden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2003 11:01 AM
Subject: Re: [smartBridges] APP repeater firmware?


> Jerry Carter wrote:
>
> >Yes thats what I was talking about. Is there no way
>  >you can make a version of the firmware that allows your
>  >firmware to turn your address 4 field off in repeater
>  >mode so that it can work with other products? If you
>  >can make non-sb be able to connect to repeater why can
>  >you not make the repeater connect to non-sb for uplink?
>  >Now I suppose that to use your product I have to get back
>  >to back radios everywhere I want a repeater?
>
> In order for the repeater to transparently forward frames from
> its clients to the primary AP, the AP must support "address 4".
> You can't do transparent bridging of ethernet frames without "address
> 4".
>
> It might perhaps be possible to make a repeater that doesn't require
> "address 4" support on the primary AP - but that would require the
> repeater to do MAC NAT similar to the airBridge in multimac mode.
>
> --
> LarsG
>
> The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List
> To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe
smartBridges <yournickname>
> To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe
smartBridges)
> Archives: http://198.63.203.6
>


The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List
To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe smartBridges 
<yournickname>
To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe smartBridges)
Archives: http://198.63.203.6  

Reply via email to