Seeni, thanks a million, can't wait
to get an update to fix this that combined with my new wipop's should have
me wipping my compettitors a*s J Hope to see some news soon.... Talk to yaz later and keep up
the good work tell the devel staff the same.
Chris
From: Seeni
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, June 28, 2003
11:07 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
We are already taking the necessary steps to overcome the problem of freezing
related issue in our current products.
Seeni, SB support
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of phantam
Sent: Saturday, June 28, 2003 8:22
AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [smartBridges]
Fragmenataion and RTS Levels
Seeni are we talking another 3 months for a service
release or shorter with some luck? Can't wait for some improved automated work
I really haven't the time to do rts and the other settings manually and I
really need some advantages besides price to advicse sb usage to my network
administrator especially to tide him over on buying cisco ap's which I DO NOT
WANT. Just want a nice rock solid system that doesn't freeze and works well
with little packetloss until nexus comes out with vlan tagging and bandwidth
management then I will upgrade everything to that.
Chris
-----Original Message-----
From: Dan Petermann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 6:15 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Oops, typo. You are right. It should be
1900 /1800 Frag. / RTS.
At 06:07 PM 6/27/2003 -0400, you wrote:
>Ok, with RTS and Frag set to
the same number, doesn't RTS become usless?
>I.e. you are telling the system
to frag any packets greater that 1800,
>and you are telling RTS to
confrim on packets greater than 1800, so
>nothing to RTS since you are
frag'ing below that level. Am I missing
>something?
>
>Scott
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Dan Petermann
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2003 15:08:16
-0600
>Subject: RE: [smartBridges]
Fragmenataion and RTS Levels
>
> > I'd start with the RTS
settings.
> >
> > RTS (Request To Send)
will let the AP know when it has a packets to
> > send.
> > The AP will then tell the
other client radios to shut up and let the
> > one
> > that sent the RTS to send
it's packets. I haven't had to change the RTS
> > or
> > Frag settings on our
SmartBridges AP's yet, only on our Aironets. On
> > links
> > that have really bad problems
I've set the AP side Frag to 1800 and RTS
> > to
> > 1800 (and matched the
client side too).
> >
> > It hasn't totally stopped
all packet loss but it has lowered it quite a
> > bit. The lowest I've had
to set the RTS is 1736.
> >
> > Hope this helps.
> >
> > Dan Petermann
> > Wyoming.com
> >
> >
> >
> > At 04:42 PM 6/27/2003
-0400, you wrote:
> >
> > >I have had little
effect by fiddling with the rts settings or frag
> > >settings, :( I think
that a 24 would be overkill but I don't do ptp
> > links often
> > >
> > >I wish I knew what I
was doing wrong I tied changing one client's rts
> > and
> > >frag all over the
place to try to get rid of some bad packetloss but
> > it
> > >didn't seem to have
any helping effect at all. Still have the same
> > >problem, my question
is if there all set to default can changing one
> > of
> > >the units properties
help that unit without having to change the rest?
> > >Also what are these
settings on the ap used for?
> > >
> > >Chris
> > >
> > >PS Almost all of my
clients are seeing packetloss
> > >
> > >-----Original
Message-----
> > >From: Sam
> > [<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > >Sent: Friday, June
27, 2003 1:21 PM
> > >To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > >Nish
> > >
> > >Is there any
documentation anywhere about altering the fragmenataiton
> > and
> > >RTS settings on an APPO
or would I ever want to mess with those?
> > >
> > >Also, I have two
APPOs that I'm using to backhaul about 60 clients
> > >through. The APPOs
are about 2.2 miles apart, clear line of sight. I
> > am
> > >currently using 18dB
flat panel antennas. Some customers seem to think
> > >they are running
slower than they should be. Would going to 24 dB
> > >parabolic grids be
overkill on this short of a link? Also, how many
> > >clients can I
reasonably backhaul through that link?
> > >
> > >Thanks
> > >Sam
> > >
> > >The PART-15.ORG
smartBridges Discussion List
> > >To Join: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in
> > the
> > >body type subscribe
smartBridges <yournickname>
> > >To Remove: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > (in
> > >the body type
unsubscribe smartBridges)
> > >Archives: <http://archives.part-15.org>http://archives.part-15.org
> >
> >
>
>The PART-15.ORG smartBridges
Discussion List
>To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body
type subscribe
>smartBridges
<yournickname>
>To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body
type unsubscribe
>smartBridges)
>Archives: http://archives.part-15.org
The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List
To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body
type subscribe smartBridges <yournickname>
To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body
type unsubscribe smartBridges)
Archives: http://archives.part-15.org
